Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Romania Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Romania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechoslovakians

Immigrants from Romania

Good
Exceptional
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,314
SOCIAL INDEX
90.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
21st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Romania Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,536,029 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.593. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.247% in Immigrants from Romania. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 246.7 Immigrants from Romania.
Czechoslovakian Integration in Immigrants from Romania Communities

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Romania Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,806 compared to $49,463, a difference of 12.9%), median household income ($84,965 compared to $94,222, a difference of 10.9%), and median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $42,718, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 4.3%), householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $64,462, a difference of 6.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $55,522, a difference of 8.4%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Romania Income
Income MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from Romania
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,806
Exceptional
$49,463
Median Family Income
Average
$103,273
Exceptional
$113,434
Median Household Income
Average
$84,965
Exceptional
$94,222
Median Earnings
Average
$46,658
Exceptional
$51,337
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,382
Exceptional
$61,040
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,738
Exceptional
$42,718
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,224
Exceptional
$55,522
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$95,070
Exceptional
$104,713
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,387
Exceptional
$110,633
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,581
Exceptional
$64,462
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.2%
Tragic
27.0%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Romania Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.0%), single female poverty (21.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 13.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.2%), receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.8%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Romania Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from Romania
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
9.9%
Females
Exceptional
12.4%
Exceptional
12.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
20.0%
Exceptional
18.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.7%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.8%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
14.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Fair
21.3%
Exceptional
18.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Exceptional
27.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.9%
Good
11.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.0%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Romania Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 10.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.87%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.0%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Romania Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from Romania
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Excellent
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Average
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Excellent
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.4%
Excellent
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.3%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Romania Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.36%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Romania Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from Romania
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.3%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.5%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.9%
Fair
36.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.5%
Good
75.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Exceptional
83.3%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Romania Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 14.9%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.6%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.10%), married-couple households (48.5% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.53%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.81%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Romania Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from Romania
Family Households
Excellent
64.6%
Good
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Fair
27.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
48.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
5.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Exceptional
11.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.0%
Exceptional
27.9%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Romania Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 45.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 15.3%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Romania Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from Romania
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
11.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
88.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.8%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Poor
6.0%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Romania Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 27.8%), master's degree (14.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 21.7%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.4% compared to 87.5%, a difference of 0.12%), 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.34%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Romania Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from Romania
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Excellent
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Exceptional
96.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.1%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Exceptional
93.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
92.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Exceptional
90.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.4%
Exceptional
87.5%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.8%
Exceptional
68.9%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Exceptional
63.3%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.0%
Exceptional
50.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Exceptional
42.9%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.5%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Exceptional
5.4%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Exceptional
2.1%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Romania Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Romania communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 27.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.8%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 1.2%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.4%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Romania Disability
Disability MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from Romania
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.7%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Exceptional
46.0%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Average
3.0%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Excellent
2.4%