Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Ethiopia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 173,161,579 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.420. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.085% in Immigrants from Ethiopia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 84.5 Immigrants from Ethiopia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 30.7%), median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $42,744, a difference of 10.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $65,238, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $55,434, a difference of 0.090%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $95,256, a difference of 0.20%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $102,763, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 27.0%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 17.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.74%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 69.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (48.5% compared to 43.1%, a difference of 12.8%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 12.4%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.25, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 33.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 24.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 53.0%, a difference of 12.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 51.4%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 31.4%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.92%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Ethiopia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 36.7%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 32.8%), and male disability (12.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.44%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 7.8%).