Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Philippines Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Philippines
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechoslovakians

Immigrants from Philippines

Good
Average
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,107
SOCIAL INDEX
58.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
163rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Philippines Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 335,143,038 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.240. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.082% in Immigrants from Philippines. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 82.3 Immigrants from Philippines.
Czechoslovakian Integration in Immigrants from Philippines Communities

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Philippines Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 14.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $57,930, a difference of 13.1%), and median household income ($84,965 compared to $93,899, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($43,806 compared to $44,000, a difference of 0.44%), median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $55,809, a difference of 0.77%), and median earnings ($46,658 compared to $48,266, a difference of 3.5%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Philippines Income
Income MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from Philippines
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,806
Average
$44,000
Median Family Income
Average
$103,273
Exceptional
$108,288
Median Household Income
Average
$84,965
Exceptional
$93,899
Median Earnings
Average
$46,658
Exceptional
$48,266
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,382
Good
$55,809
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,738
Exceptional
$41,114
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,224
Exceptional
$57,930
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$95,070
Exceptional
$102,910
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,387
Exceptional
$108,471
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,581
Exceptional
$66,161
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
24.7%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Philippines Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 22.8%), single father poverty (17.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 21.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.30%), female poverty (12.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.3%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Philippines Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from Philippines
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Exceptional
12.4%
Exceptional
12.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
20.0%
Exceptional
16.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.7%
Exceptional
12.0%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.8%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
14.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
10.9%
Single Females
Fair
21.3%
Exceptional
18.6%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Exceptional
14.0%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Exceptional
26.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Excellent
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.9%
Good
11.9%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.7%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Philippines Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.5%), unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 2.3%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Philippines Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from Philippines
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Poor
5.4%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
11.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Average
17.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Fair
10.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Poor
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Poor
5.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Poor
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.4%
Poor
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Average
5.4%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Philippines Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 19.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.30%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Philippines Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from Philippines
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.3%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.5%
Good
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.9%
Tragic
35.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.5%
Average
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Fair
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Fair
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Good
82.9%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Philippines Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 8.5%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.37, a difference of 7.9%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.5% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 1.6%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 2.6%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Philippines Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from Philippines
Family Households
Excellent
64.6%
Exceptional
68.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
29.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
49.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Exceptional
3.37
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Good
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Exceptional
47.6%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.0%
Excellent
30.4%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Philippines Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 20.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 0.52%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.89%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 9.2%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Philippines Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from Philippines
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
91.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.8%
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
23.8%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
8.5%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Philippines Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 59.0%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Philippines Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from Philippines
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.4%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
94.9%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Tragic
94.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
93.7%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.1%
Tragic
92.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Tragic
91.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
90.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Tragic
87.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.4%
Poor
84.8%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.8%
Fair
64.8%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Fair
58.7%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.0%
Poor
45.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Poor
36.4%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.5%
Tragic
13.6%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Tragic
3.9%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Tragic
1.6%

Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Philippines Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Philippines communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 29.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.75%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 23.2%, a difference of 0.76%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.4%).
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Philippines Disability
Disability MetricCzechoslovakianImmigrants from Philippines
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Good
23.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Tragic
48.8%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Average
3.0%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Excellent
6.0%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%