Czechoslovakian vs Ecuadorian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 241,905,999 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.768. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.456% in Ecuadorians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 455.8 Ecuadorians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 23.1%), householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $54,958, a difference of 10.2%), and median family income ($103,273 compared to $95,114, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $39,117, a difference of 0.98%), median earnings ($46,658 compared to $45,214, a difference of 3.2%), and median household income ($84,965 compared to $82,070, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 49.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 48.1%), and receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.3% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 1.5%), single father poverty (17.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.5%), and single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.9%), unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 29.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 33.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 22.3%), currently married (48.8% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 12.0%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.51%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 190.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 59.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 54.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 18.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 42.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 54.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 82.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 22.8%), and college, under 1 year (65.8% compared to 59.3%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Ecuadorian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 41.5%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 38.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.7%).