Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Venezuela Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,666,614 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Venezuela within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.425. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.165% in Immigrants from Venezuela. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 165.4 Immigrants from Venezuela.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Venezuela communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $87,038, a difference of 9.2%), median family income ($103,273 compared to $94,904, a difference of 8.8%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $50,109, a difference of 2.2%), median household income ($84,965 compared to $81,506, a difference of 4.2%), and median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $37,003, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Venezuela communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 34.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 34.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.34%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.48%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.3% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Venezuela communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Venezuela communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 33.7%, a difference of 24.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 73.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Venezuela communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 14.2%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 8.3%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 1.1%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.4%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Venezuela communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 36.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 22.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.36%), no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 55.8%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Venezuela communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 25.6%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.1%), and bachelor's degree (37.0% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.49%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.50%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Venezuela communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 36.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 29.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.28%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.47%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.6%).