Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Morocco Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,542,251 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Morocco within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.588. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.191% in Immigrants from Morocco. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 190.9 Immigrants from Morocco.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 16.9%), median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $42,229, a difference of 9.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $54,593, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $60,647, a difference of 0.11%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $102,015, a difference of 0.62%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $97,305, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 22.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (16.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.3%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 15.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.76%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (48.5% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 9.8%), currently married (48.8% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 7.5%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.27%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.21, a difference of 2.5%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 61.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 39.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 5.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 50.3%, a difference of 18.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 33.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 39.1%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.8%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.71%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.72%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Morocco communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 31.4%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 28.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 0.41%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.5%).