Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Belgium Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 127,899,246 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.869. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.353% in Immigrants from Belgium. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 353.3 Immigrants from Belgium.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,806 compared to $55,082, a difference of 25.7%), median family income ($103,273 compared to $123,831, a difference of 19.9%), and median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $66,125, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 3.0%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $54,830, a difference of 7.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $69,703, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 12.0%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 11.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.87%), male poverty (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.93%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 15.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 11.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.080%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.86%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 18.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.79%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.0%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.15, a difference of 0.83%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 50.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 18.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 65.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 61.4%), and master's degree (14.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.0% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Immigrants from Belgium communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 20.1%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 19.8%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.40%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.8%).