Czechoslovakian vs Tongan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,070,655 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Tongans within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.540. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.195% in Tongans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 194.7 Tongans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $68,235, a difference of 12.6%), householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $56,972, a difference of 11.2%), and median household income ($84,965 compared to $93,076, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $38,288, a difference of 1.2%), median earnings ($46,658 compared to $45,665, a difference of 2.2%), and median family income ($103,273 compared to $105,967, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 39.7%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 28.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and family poverty (8.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 35.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 21.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.57%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (27.0% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 15.5%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 12.9%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.49, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.69%), currently married (48.8% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 0.97%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 51.6%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 41.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 22.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.60%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 40.3%), master's degree (14.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 16.2%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.73%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.73%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.3%), ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.4%), and male disability (12.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 3.4%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 7.0%).