Czechoslovakian vs Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 99,577,115 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.865. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.416% in Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 1,415.9 Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $65,329, a difference of 27.5%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 9.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,387 compared to $110,201, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $39,159, a difference of 1.1%), per capita income ($43,806 compared to $45,195, a difference of 3.2%), and median earnings ($46,658 compared to $48,304, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 45.8%), single father poverty (17.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 45.6%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 1.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 26.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.4%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 38.3%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 45.8%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 22.3%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.24, a difference of 3.7%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 50.8%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 60.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 0.78%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 51.3%), master's degree (14.5% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 9.0%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.4% compared to 87.0%, a difference of 0.41%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.92%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 38.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 22.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.60%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and female disability (12.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 2.1%).