Czechoslovakian vs Nigerian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Czechoslovakian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Nigerian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Czechoslovakians

Nigerians

Good
Poor
7,027
SOCIAL INDEX
67.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
132nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,996
SOCIAL INDEX
17.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
277th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Nigerian Integration in Czechoslovakian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 250,827,662 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Nigerians within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.825. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.195% in Nigerians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 194.6 Nigerians.
Czechoslovakian Integration in Nigerian Communities

Czechoslovakian vs Nigerian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 22.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,070 compared to $87,730, a difference of 8.4%), and per capita income ($43,806 compared to $41,026, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $39,641, a difference of 2.3%), median earnings ($46,658 compared to $45,532, a difference of 2.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $58,992, a difference of 2.7%).
Czechoslovakian vs Nigerian Income
Income MetricCzechoslovakianNigerian
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,806
Tragic
$41,026
Median Family Income
Average
$103,273
Tragic
$97,522
Median Household Income
Average
$84,965
Poor
$81,725
Median Earnings
Average
$46,658
Fair
$45,532
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,382
Tragic
$52,039
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,738
Average
$39,641
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,224
Tragic
$49,416
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$95,070
Tragic
$87,730
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,387
Tragic
$95,492
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,581
Poor
$58,992
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
23.0%

Czechoslovakian vs Nigerian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 27.3%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 26.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.3% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 0.57%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
Czechoslovakian vs Nigerian Poverty
Poverty MetricCzechoslovakianNigerian
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
13.6%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
10.1%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
12.3%
Females
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
14.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
20.0%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.7%
Tragic
14.4%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.8%
Tragic
19.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
18.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
18.5%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Tragic
18.7%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Fair
12.9%
Single Females
Fair
21.3%
Fair
21.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Fair
29.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
11.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
13.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
13.1%

Czechoslovakian vs Nigerian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.8%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.7%).
Czechoslovakian vs Nigerian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCzechoslovakianNigerian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
13.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
18.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
11.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.7%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.3%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.4%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Tragic
8.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Tragic
10.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.1%

Czechoslovakian vs Nigerian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 36.1%, a difference of 16.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.25%).
Czechoslovakian vs Nigerian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCzechoslovakianNigerian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.3%
Exceptional
66.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.5%
Good
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.9%
Fair
36.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.5%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Average
82.7%

Czechoslovakian vs Nigerian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 30.3%), married-couple households (48.5% compared to 43.2%, a difference of 12.5%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.0%), family households (64.6% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.3%).
Czechoslovakian vs Nigerian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCzechoslovakianNigerian
Family Households
Excellent
64.6%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
28.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
43.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.13
Exceptional
3.29
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Average
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Tragic
43.4%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Fair
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.0%
Tragic
35.3%

Czechoslovakian vs Nigerian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 54.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 18.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.0%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 52.8%, a difference of 13.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 16.9%).
Czechoslovakian vs Nigerian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCzechoslovakianNigerian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
12.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
88.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.8%
Tragic
52.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Tragic
18.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Poor
6.0%

Czechoslovakian vs Nigerian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 44.6%), ged/equivalency (87.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and high school diploma (90.9% compared to 88.2%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.47%), bachelor's degree (37.0% compared to 37.2%, a difference of 0.54%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.80%).
Czechoslovakian vs Nigerian Education Level
Education Level MetricCzechoslovakianNigerian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.6%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
96.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
95.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Tragic
95.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.1%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Tragic
91.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Tragic
90.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.9%
Tragic
88.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.4%
Tragic
84.7%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.8%
Poor
64.3%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Fair
58.5%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.0%
Poor
45.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Fair
37.2%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.5%
Average
14.9%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Fair
4.2%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Fair
1.8%

Czechoslovakian vs Nigerian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Nigerian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 34.5%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 18.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.89%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.9%).
Czechoslovakian vs Nigerian Disability
Disability MetricCzechoslovakianNigerian
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Excellent
11.5%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Excellent
12.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Fair
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.8%
Poor
11.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.0%
Tragic
24.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Poor
47.7%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Good
6.1%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Good
2.4%