Czechoslovakian vs Luxembourger Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,135,272 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers within Czechoslovakian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.344% in Luxembourgers. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechoslovakians corresponds to an increase of 343.9 Luxembourgers.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,806 compared to $45,663, a difference of 4.2%), median female earnings ($38,738 compared to $39,891, a difference of 3.0%), and median family income ($103,273 compared to $106,183, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($60,581 compared to $60,967, a difference of 0.64%), median male earnings ($55,382 compared to $56,300, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,224 compared to $50,379, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 13.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.8% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 12.6%), and receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.18%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.24%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 22.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.56%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.9% compared to 45.3%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 66.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 29.4%, a difference of 8.9%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 8.1%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.11%), married-couple households (48.5% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.10, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 46.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 1.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 9.7%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 8.1%), and bachelor's degree (37.0% compared to 39.8%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.050%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czechoslovakian and Luxembourger communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 14.8%), ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.2%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 44.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.0% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 7.6%).