Slovak vs Chickasaw Per Capita Income
COMPARE
Slovak
Chickasaw
Per Capita Income
Per Capita Income Comparison
Slovaks
Chickasaw
$44,229
PER CAPITA INCOME
65.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
$36,475
PER CAPITA INCOME
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
312th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slovak vs Chickasaw Per Capita Income Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 397,898,984 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Slovaks and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.360 and weighted average of $44,229. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,726,791 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and per capita income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.505 and weighted average of $36,475, a difference of 21.3%.
Per Capita Income Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Slovak | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | $16,734 | $10,758 |
| Maximum | $58,546 | $42,047 |
| Range | $41,812 | $31,289 |
| Mean | $36,677 | $28,009 |
| Median | $36,437 | $27,826 |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | $31,763 | $24,362 |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | $41,360 | $31,977 |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | $9,597 | $7,616 |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | $7,565 | $5,659 |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | $7,521 | $5,624 |
Similar Demographics by Per Capita Income
Demographics Similar to Slovaks by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Slovaks are South American Indian ($44,206, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Nepal ($44,187, a difference of 0.090%), Uruguayan ($44,318, a difference of 0.20%), South American ($44,114, a difference of 0.26%), and Portuguese ($44,362, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
| Koreans | 72.5 /100 | #149 | Good $44,522 |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 72.1 /100 | #150 | Good $44,509 |
| Norwegians | 71.5 /100 | #151 | Good $44,480 |
| Peruvians | 71.5 /100 | #152 | Good $44,479 |
| Scottish | 70.6 /100 | #153 | Good $44,440 |
| Portuguese | 68.7 /100 | #154 | Good $44,362 |
| Uruguayans | 67.6 /100 | #155 | Good $44,318 |
| Slovaks | 65.4 /100 | #156 | Good $44,229 |
| South American Indians | 64.8 /100 | #157 | Good $44,206 |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 64.3 /100 | #158 | Good $44,187 |
| South Americans | 62.4 /100 | #159 | Good $44,114 |
| Danes | 61.9 /100 | #160 | Good $44,095 |
| Costa Ricans | 61.8 /100 | #161 | Good $44,090 |
| Swiss | 61.4 /100 | #162 | Good $44,076 |
| Immigrants | South America | 61.2 /100 | #163 | Good $44,068 |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Per Capita Income
In terms of per capita income, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Bahamian ($36,427, a difference of 0.13%), Chippewa ($36,631, a difference of 0.43%), Ute ($36,651, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Honduras ($36,665, a difference of 0.52%), and Fijian ($36,690, a difference of 0.59%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Per Capita Income |
| Inupiat | 0.1 /100 | #305 | Tragic $36,999 |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic $36,849 |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic $36,823 |
| Fijians | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic $36,690 |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic $36,665 |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic $36,651 |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic $36,631 |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic $36,475 |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic $36,427 |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic $36,180 |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic $36,112 |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic $35,999 |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic $35,922 |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic $35,897 |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic $35,720 |