Jamaican vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Jamaican
Chickasaw
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Jamaicans
Chickasaw
19.7%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
264th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Jamaican vs Chickasaw Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 362,780,888 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Jamaicans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.129 and weighted average of 19.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,952,830 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542 and weighted average of 19.6%, a difference of 0.23%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Jamaican | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 2.1% | 3.8% |
| Maximum | 58.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 56.7% | 96.2% |
| Mean | 20.6% | 26.8% |
| Median | 19.9% | 21.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.4% | 17.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.4% | 31.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.0% | 13.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.8% | 15.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.8% | 15.4% |
Demographics Similar to Jamaicans and Chickasaw by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Jamaicans are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.43%), Spanish American (19.8%, a difference of 0.68%), Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.76%), and Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.85%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.61%), Immigrants from Jamaica (19.8%, a difference of 0.67%), and Spanish American (19.8%, a difference of 0.92%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
| Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
| Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.9% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 20.0% |