Immigrants from Nigeria vs Chickasaw Vision Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Nigeria
Chickasaw
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Nigeria
Chickasaw
2.2%
VISION DISABILITY
13.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
207th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.2%
VISION DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
338th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Nigeria vs Chickasaw Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 283,383,362 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nigeria and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.171 and weighted average of 2.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,152 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.299 and weighted average of 3.2%, a difference of 42.6%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Nigeria | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.98% | 0.33% |
Maximum | 9.2% | 15.2% |
Range | 8.2% | 14.8% |
Mean | 2.3% | 5.4% |
Median | 2.2% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.8% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.4% | 6.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.58% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.2% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.2% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Vision Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Nigeria by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nigeria are German (2.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Brazil (2.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Pennsylvania German (2.2%, a difference of 0.13%), Samoan (2.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (2.2%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Immigrants | Thailand | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 2.2% |
Slovaks | 18.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 18.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 2.2% |
Dutch | 17.1 /100 | #203 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 15.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 2.2% |
Samoans | 15.7 /100 | #205 | Poor 2.2% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 14.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 13.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 2.2% |
Germans | 13.4 /100 | #208 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 13.1 /100 | #209 | Poor 2.2% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 11.5 /100 | #210 | Poor 2.2% |
Indonesians | 9.5 /100 | #211 | Tragic 2.2% |
Bermudans | 9.0 /100 | #212 | Tragic 2.2% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 8.9 /100 | #213 | Tragic 2.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 8.2 /100 | #214 | Tragic 2.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Tsimshian (3.2%, a difference of 0.69%), Creek (3.2%, a difference of 0.82%), Dutch West Indian (3.2%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (3.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and Navajo (3.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 3.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 3.1% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 3.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 3.1% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 3.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 3.2% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 3.2% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 3.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 3.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 3.3% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 3.3% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 3.3% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 3.4% |