Chinese vs Indonesian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,924,670 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Indonesians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.324. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.072% in Indonesians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 71.7 Indonesians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $54,176, a difference of 43.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $84,890, a difference of 36.8%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $72,856, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 14.0%), median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $36,140, a difference of 14.7%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $41,701, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 75.7%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 75.2%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 74.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 13.0%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 28.4%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 31.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 33.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 25.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.81%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 45.0%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 30.0%), and married-couple households (50.4% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.28, a difference of 2.0%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and family households (68.1% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 48.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 30.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 12.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 25.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 117.9%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 21.6%), and associate's degree (48.5% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.8%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Indonesian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 28.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.0%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.37%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.96%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.2%).