Chinese vs Immigrants from Hungary Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,933,146 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hungary within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.375. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.034% in Immigrants from Hungary. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 34.5 Immigrants from Hungary.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $64,277, a difference of 20.5%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $52,798, a difference of 10.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $108,267, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $41,820, a difference of 0.86%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,264 compared to $102,655, a difference of 1.6%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $50,227, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 34.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 32.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 4.3%), receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 30.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 21.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.6%), family households (68.1% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 51.5%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 35.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 54.2%, a difference of 10.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 29.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 30.6%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.2%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Hungary communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 20.1%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 17.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.070%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.5%).