Chinese vs Vietnamese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Vietnamese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Vietnamese
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,448
SOCIAL INDEX
22.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
257th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Vietnamese Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,104,456 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Vietnamese within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.418. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.117% in Vietnamese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 116.8 Vietnamese.
Chinese vs Vietnamese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $56,143, a difference of 38.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $93,788, a difference of 23.8%), and wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $40,377, a difference of 2.7%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $56,127, a difference of 3.6%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $46,172, a difference of 5.8%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Vietnamese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Poor $42,368 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Tragic $96,123 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Poor $82,248 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Average $46,172 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Poor $52,525 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Excellent $40,377 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Exceptional $56,127 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Fair $92,089 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Tragic $93,788 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Tragic $56,143 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Exceptional 21.0% |
Chinese vs Vietnamese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 103.6%), family poverty (6.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 76.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 74.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 5.9%), single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 15.4%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 25.4%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Vietnamese |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Tragic 15.0% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 11.5% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 16.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Tragic 21.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 14.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Tragic 19.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 19.4% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Tragic 19.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Good 12.7% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Tragic 22.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Average 16.3% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Tragic 30.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Tragic 7.4% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 14.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Tragic 15.9% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 15.7% |
Chinese vs Vietnamese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 54.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 52.1%), and female unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 24.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Vietnamese |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.5% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.6% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 6.5% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 14.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Tragic 21.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 5.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 6.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 5.7% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Tragic 8.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Good 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.5% |
Chinese vs Vietnamese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 30.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Vietnamese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Tragic 64.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Tragic 78.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Tragic 29.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Tragic 70.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Tragic 82.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 83.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Tragic 80.8% |
Chinese vs Vietnamese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 29.1%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 43.6%, a difference of 15.4%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.14%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.37, a difference of 0.90%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Vietnamese |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Average 64.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Excellent 27.7% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Tragic 43.6% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Exceptional 3.37 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Poor 6.7% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Tragic 44.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Excellent 30.2% |
Chinese vs Vietnamese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 219.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 128.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 91.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 24.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 56.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 91.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Vietnamese |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 26.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Tragic 73.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Tragic 38.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Tragic 12.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Tragic 3.9% |
Chinese vs Vietnamese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 115.6%), college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 61.7%, a difference of 10.8%), and college, 1 year or more (62.2% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (38.5% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 0.0%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Vietnamese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Tragic 3.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Tragic 96.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 96.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.2% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 95.9% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 95.3% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Tragic 93.9% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Tragic 93.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 92.3% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 90.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Tragic 89.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Tragic 87.9% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Tragic 85.4% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Tragic 61.7% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Tragic 57.0% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Fair 45.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Excellent 15.8% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Good 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Average 1.9% |
Chinese vs Vietnamese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Vietnamese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 54.1%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 0.81%, a difference of 40.5%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.39%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.8%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Vietnamese |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 0.81% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 5.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Good 23.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Poor 47.9% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Excellent 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 17.7% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Average 6.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |