Chinese vs Pakistani Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chinese
Pakistani
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chinese
Pakistanis
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,084
SOCIAL INDEX
78.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
88th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Pakistani Integration in Chinese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,487,544 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pakistanis within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.315. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.051% in Pakistanis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 50.6 Pakistanis.
Chinese vs Pakistani Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $63,844, a difference of 21.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $105,317, a difference of 10.3%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $89,638, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $56,719, a difference of 0.27%), wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 0.57%), and per capita income ($46,098 compared to $45,587, a difference of 1.1%).
Income Metric | Chinese | Pakistani |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,098 | Excellent $45,587 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $116,188 | Exceptional $107,390 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $98,496 | Exceptional $89,638 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,836 | Exceptional $48,254 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,872 | Excellent $56,719 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,461 | Excellent $40,596 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $58,162 | Exceptional $53,325 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,264 | Excellent $98,401 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $116,156 | Exceptional $105,317 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $77,465 | Exceptional $63,844 |
Wage/Income Gap | Average 25.9% | Fair 26.1% |
Chinese vs Pakistani Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 29.9%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 29.7%), and family poverty (6.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 2.2%), receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 12.7%).
Poverty Metric | Chinese | Pakistani |
Poverty | Exceptional 9.5% | Excellent 11.9% |
Families | Exceptional 6.5% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Males | Exceptional 8.7% | Excellent 10.8% |
Females | Exceptional 10.4% | Excellent 12.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Good 19.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.0% | Excellent 13.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.1% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.0% | Exceptional 12.4% |
Single Females | Exceptional 16.1% | Exceptional 20.2% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 15.7% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 24.6% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.6% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 9.1% | Excellent 11.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Chinese vs Pakistani Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 50.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 21.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 4.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Chinese | Pakistani |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Excellent 5.1% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.5% | Excellent 5.1% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.0% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Good 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Excellent 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Excellent 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Fair 8.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Excellent 5.2% |
Chinese vs Pakistani Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 37.6%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.85%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chinese | Pakistani |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Exceptional 65.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Good 79.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Excellent 37.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.3% | Exceptional 75.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Good 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.1% | Average 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.1% | Average 82.8% |
Chinese vs Pakistani Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 17.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.6%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 0.80%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.8%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 5.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Chinese | Pakistani |
Family Households | Exceptional 68.1% | Excellent 64.7% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.0% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.4% | Excellent 47.3% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.34 | Fair 3.22 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Good 2.3% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.2% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.5% | Good 47.2% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.2% | Excellent 30.5% |
Chinese vs Pakistani Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 26.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 13.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.62%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chinese | Pakistani |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.9% | Exceptional 91.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.1% | Exceptional 57.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.9% | Exceptional 21.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.8% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Chinese vs Pakistani Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 43.0%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.1%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.65%).
Education Level Metric | Chinese | Pakistani |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Average 2.1% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Fair 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Fair 97.9% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Fair 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Fair 97.7% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Fair 97.5% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Average 97.3% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Average 97.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Average 96.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Average 95.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Good 95.0% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Good 93.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Good 91.5% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Good 89.6% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.0% | Excellent 86.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Exceptional 67.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Exceptional 61.5% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.5% | Excellent 48.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Good 38.5% | Excellent 39.7% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Excellent 15.8% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Chinese vs Pakistani Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Pakistani communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 17.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 2.2%), female disability (12.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.4%).
Disability Metric | Chinese | Pakistani |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Average 11.7% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Fair 11.3% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Excellent 12.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Poor 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Good 11.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.7% | Average 23.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Fair 47.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Good 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Poor 3.1% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 15.9% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Excellent 6.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Good 2.4% |