Chinese vs Pima Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Chinese
Pima
Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Chinese
Pima
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
289th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
296th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Pima Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,631 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.314 and weighted average of 3.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,536,530 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.125 and weighted average of 3.7%, a difference of 0.90%.
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Pima |
| Minimum | 0.63% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 11.0% | 13.0% |
| Range | 10.4% | 12.0% |
| Mean | 4.4% | 5.4% |
| Median | 3.9% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.3% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.4% | 6.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.2% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.2% | 2.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Pima by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are White/Caucasian (3.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Finnish (3.7%, a difference of 0.15%), Irish (3.7%, a difference of 0.21%), Native Hawaiian (3.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Immigrants from the Azores (3.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Welsh (3.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Celtic (3.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Iroquois (3.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and German (3.7%, a difference of 0.54%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability |
| Swedes | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 3.6% |
| Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Irish | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Finns | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Norwegians | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Welsh | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Germans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Scottish | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 3.7% |
| Dutch | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 3.7% |