Chinese vs Delaware Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,391,273 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Delaware within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.459. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.046% in Delaware. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 45.6 Delaware.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Delaware communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $58,214, a difference of 33.1%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $47,159, a difference of 23.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $94,914, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.6%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $52,412, a difference of 8.5%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $44,783, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Delaware communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 44.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 43.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 22.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 22.9%), and receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 24.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Delaware communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 51.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 44.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 7.6%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Delaware communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.83%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Delaware communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 26.6%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 26.2%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.20, a difference of 4.5%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and family households (68.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Delaware communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 22.5%), no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.96%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 58.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Delaware communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 23.2%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 18.3%), and associate's degree (48.5% compared to 42.3%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.22%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Delaware communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 38.0%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 33.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 4.9%).