Chinese vs Immigrants from Germany Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,449,076 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Germany within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.174. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.036% in Immigrants from Germany. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 36.1 Immigrants from Germany.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $62,544, a difference of 23.9%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $51,190, a difference of 13.6%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $86,764, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $56,542, a difference of 0.58%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $45,751, a difference of 0.76%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $47,566, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 36.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 33.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.9%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 9.9%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 19.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 55.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.38%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 78.8%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.83%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.0%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.1%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 3.5%), family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.15, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 30.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 14.6%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.51%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 20.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.8%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Germany communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.1%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 24.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.72%), male disability (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.3%).