Chinese vs Bulgarian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,571,573 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.183. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Bulgarians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 17.5 Bulgarians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bulgarian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $66,236, a difference of 17.0%), per capita income ($46,098 compared to $50,906, a difference of 10.4%), and median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $62,378, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($116,188 compared to $117,818, a difference of 1.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $113,883, a difference of 2.0%), and median household income ($98,496 compared to $96,290, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bulgarian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 17.5%), single female poverty (16.1% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 16.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 2.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bulgarian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 59.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.56%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bulgarian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 76.4%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 81.1%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bulgarian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 11.7%), family households (68.1% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.13, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), currently married (49.5% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 0.79%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bulgarian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 53.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 27.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.80%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bulgarian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 35.2%), master's degree (14.6% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 28.7%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (97.1% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.070%), 8th grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and ged/equivalency (89.0% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Bulgarian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 21.7%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.1%), cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 2.9%).