Chinese vs Puget Sound Salish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,748,260 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.037. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in Puget Sound Salish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to an increase of 29.8 Puget Sound Salish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($77,465 compared to $59,934, a difference of 29.2%), median family income ($116,188 compared to $97,958, a difference of 18.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $98,340, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 2.2%), householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $55,543, a difference of 4.7%), and median female earnings ($41,461 compared to $39,376, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 34.2%), married-couple family poverty (3.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 33.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 11.3%), and single male poverty (11.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 68.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 23.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.50%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 0.97%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 36.2%), single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.2%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 0.64%), family households (68.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 15.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 46.8%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 44.9%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 30.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.29%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 31.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 29.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 2.2%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 7.3%).