Chinese vs Immigrants from Ireland Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,635,240 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ireland within Chinese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.057. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chinese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from Ireland. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chinese corresponds to a decrease of 9.1 Immigrants from Ireland.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,098 compared to $56,584, a difference of 22.8%), median male earnings ($56,872 compared to $67,698, a difference of 19.0%), and median earnings ($48,836 compared to $56,854, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($58,162 compared to $57,075, a difference of 1.9%), wage/income gap (25.9% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,156 compared to $122,757, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (9.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 31.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 20.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.2% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (12.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and single mother poverty (24.6% compared to 25.8%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (5.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 37.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 10.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.3% compared to 74.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.26%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 11.2%), family households (68.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 7.9%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 0.080%), divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 66.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 64.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 6.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 52.0%, a difference of 15.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 37.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 43.9%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 41.2%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.31%), 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chinese and Immigrants from Ireland communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 21.4%), male disability (12.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 13.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (15.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 4.0%).