Celtic vs Taiwanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,170,137 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.007. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Taiwanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to a decrease of 4.4 Taiwanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,241 compared to $101,492, a difference of 10.0%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and median household income ($83,193 compared to $89,900, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,447 compared to $49,804, a difference of 1.3%), median male earnings ($54,242 compared to $55,556, a difference of 2.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,608 compared to $62,894, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 32.8%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 29.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and poverty (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 46.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 41.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.68%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.88%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 22.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 14.9%), divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 12.8%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.43%), family households (63.8% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.68%), and married-couple households (47.3% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 44.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 9.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.94%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 52.6%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.4%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (65.9% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.63%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.91%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 33.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 30.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.9%).