Iroquois vs Taiwanese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Taiwanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Iroquois

Taiwanese

Fair
Good
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Taiwanese Integration in Iroquois Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,165,882 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Taiwanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 3.2 Taiwanese.
Iroquois Integration in Taiwanese Communities

Iroquois vs Taiwanese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $101,492, a difference of 21.3%), median household income ($74,279 compared to $89,900, a difference of 21.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $104,180, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 0.27%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $49,804, a difference of 5.1%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $40,576, a difference of 11.5%).
Iroquois vs Taiwanese Income
Income MetricIroquoisTaiwanese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,104
Exceptional
$46,455
Median Family Income
Tragic
$90,543
Exceptional
$107,295
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,279
Exceptional
$89,900
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,430
Excellent
$47,902
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,374
Good
$55,556
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,408
Excellent
$40,576
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,380
Tragic
$49,804
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$83,682
Exceptional
$101,492
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,255
Excellent
$104,180
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,737
Excellent
$62,894
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Excellent
25.1%

Iroquois vs Taiwanese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 51.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 48.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 11.5%).
Iroquois vs Taiwanese Poverty
Poverty MetricIroquoisTaiwanese
Poverty
Tragic
14.5%
Good
12.2%
Families
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
13.2%
Good
11.0%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Good
13.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
21.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
11.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.0%
Exceptional
14.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
14.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
14.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
14.6%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
10.9%
Single Females
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
19.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.7%
Exceptional
14.3%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
27.5%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.9%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.0%
Poor
12.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.5%
Excellent
11.0%

Iroquois vs Taiwanese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 43.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 42.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.7%).
Iroquois vs Taiwanese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIroquoisTaiwanese
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Average
5.3%
Males
Tragic
5.7%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
15.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Good
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
6.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.8%

Iroquois vs Taiwanese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 18.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.0%).
Iroquois vs Taiwanese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIroquoisTaiwanese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.2%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Tragic
33.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.6%
Fair
74.7%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.9%
Fair
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.6%
Exceptional
83.4%

Iroquois vs Taiwanese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 31.8%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.9%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.2% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.3%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 2.4%).
Iroquois vs Taiwanese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIroquoisTaiwanese
Family Households
Tragic
62.2%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.1%
Tragic
26.7%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.7%
Fair
45.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.7%
Poor
45.8%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.2%
Exceptional
29.0%

Iroquois vs Taiwanese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.6%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.87%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 3.0%).
Iroquois vs Taiwanese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIroquoisTaiwanese
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Tragic
11.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Tragic
88.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
54.7%
Tragic
53.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Average
19.4%
Excellent
20.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
7.0%

Iroquois vs Taiwanese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 34.7%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 32.3%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.63%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.63%).
Iroquois vs Taiwanese Education Level
Education Level MetricIroquoisTaiwanese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.3%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
97.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
94.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
94.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
93.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Tragic
92.5%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Tragic
91.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Tragic
90.0%
High School Diploma
Average
89.2%
Tragic
87.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.6%
Tragic
84.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.6%
Good
66.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Excellent
60.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.8%
Excellent
47.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.2%
Exceptional
40.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
16.1%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.1%

Iroquois vs Taiwanese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 45.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 40.0%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.59%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 10.5%).
Iroquois vs Taiwanese Disability
Disability MetricIroquoisTaiwanese
Disability
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.3%
Females
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Excellent
22.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.4%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.4%