Iroquois vs Taiwanese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Iroquois
Taiwanese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Iroquois
Taiwanese
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Taiwanese Integration in Iroquois Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 28,165,882 people shows a perfect negative correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese within Iroquois communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iroquois within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Taiwanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iroquois corresponds to a decrease of 3.2 Taiwanese.
Iroquois vs Taiwanese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,682 compared to $101,492, a difference of 21.3%), median household income ($74,279 compared to $89,900, a difference of 21.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,255 compared to $104,180, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 0.27%), householder income under 25 years ($47,380 compared to $49,804, a difference of 5.1%), and median female earnings ($36,408 compared to $40,576, a difference of 11.5%).
Income Metric | Iroquois | Taiwanese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,104 | Exceptional $46,455 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,543 | Exceptional $107,295 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,279 | Exceptional $89,900 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $42,430 | Excellent $47,902 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,374 | Good $55,556 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,408 | Excellent $40,576 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,380 | Tragic $49,804 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $83,682 | Exceptional $101,492 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,255 | Excellent $104,180 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,737 | Excellent $62,894 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.1% | Excellent 25.1% |
Iroquois vs Taiwanese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 51.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 48.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.4% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 11.5%).
Poverty Metric | Iroquois | Taiwanese |
Poverty | Tragic 14.5% | Good 12.2% |
Families | Tragic 10.7% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.2% | Good 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.8% | Good 13.1% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.9% | Tragic 21.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.5% | Exceptional 11.8% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 14.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.7% | Exceptional 19.4% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.8% | Exceptional 27.5% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 11.9% | Fair 11.2% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.0% | Poor 12.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Excellent 11.0% |
Iroquois vs Taiwanese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 43.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 42.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Iroquois | Taiwanese |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Average 5.3% |
Males | Tragic 5.7% | Fair 5.3% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 15.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Good 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.1% | Good 4.5% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 6.6% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Iroquois vs Taiwanese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 33.8%, a difference of 18.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.2% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.5% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 74.7%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Iroquois | Taiwanese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.2% | Exceptional 66.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.5% | Exceptional 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Tragic 33.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Excellent 75.6% | Fair 74.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Fair 84.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.6% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Iroquois vs Taiwanese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.2% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 31.8%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.9%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.2% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.3%), and currently married (44.7% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 2.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Iroquois | Taiwanese |
Family Households | Tragic 62.2% | Tragic 63.3% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.1% | Tragic 26.7% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.7% | Fair 45.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.16 | Average 3.23 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.7% | Poor 45.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 38.2% | Exceptional 29.0% |
Iroquois vs Taiwanese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.6%), no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.87%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 53.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 3.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Iroquois | Taiwanese |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 10.9% | Tragic 11.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Tragic 88.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 54.7% | Tragic 53.9% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Average 19.4% | Excellent 20.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Iroquois vs Taiwanese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 34.7%), no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 32.3%), and doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.63%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.63%).
Education Level Metric | Iroquois | Taiwanese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.4% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 97.3% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 97.0% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 96.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 94.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 94.7% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Tragic 93.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.3% | Tragic 92.5% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Tragic 91.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Tragic 90.0% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.2% | Tragic 87.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.6% | Tragic 84.7% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.6% | Good 66.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 56.2% | Excellent 60.7% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.8% | Excellent 47.7% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Exceptional 40.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Iroquois vs Taiwanese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iroquois and Taiwanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 45.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 40.0%), and vision disability (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.59%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 10.5%).
Disability Metric | Iroquois | Taiwanese |
Disability | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Males | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Females | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.3% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Excellent 22.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.4% | Tragic 48.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.4% |