Chilean vs Soviet Union Hearing Disability
COMPARE
Chilean
 Soviet Union
 Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Chileans
Soviet Union
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
85.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.9%
HEARING DISABILITY
84.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
135th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Soviet Union Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,625,228 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 2.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,504,651 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.185 and weighted average of 2.9%, a difference of 0.21%.
 
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chilean | Soviet Union | 
| Minimum | 0.32% | 1.0% | 
| Maximum | 6.9% | 6.1% | 
| Range | 6.5% | 5.1% | 
| Mean | 3.4% | 3.2% | 
| Median | 3.1% | 3.0% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 2.4% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.2% | 3.9% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 1.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.4% | 1.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 1.0% | 
Demographics Similar to Chileans and Soviet Union by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Immigrants from Syria (2.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Kenya (2.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Vietnam (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Uganda (2.9%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Brazil (2.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Sri Lankan (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (2.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Ugandan (2.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and Bermudan (2.9%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Immigrants | Zaire | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 2.9% | 
| Bahamians | 88.6 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Albania | 88.5 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Sudan | 87.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.9% | 
| South American Indians | 86.9 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 86.9 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Uganda | 86.6 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 86.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Kenya | 86.1 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.9% | 
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Syria | 85.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.9% | 
| Ugandans | 85.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 2.9% | 
| Soviet Union | 84.8 /100 | #135 | Excellent 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Brazil | 84.6 /100 | #136 | Excellent 2.9% | 
| Sri Lankans | 84.1 /100 | #137 | Excellent 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 84.0 /100 | #138 | Excellent 2.9% | 
| Bermudans | 83.8 /100 | #139 | Excellent 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Jordan | 83.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 2.9% | 
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 83.3 /100 | #141 | Excellent 2.9% | 
| Laotians | 81.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 2.9% | 
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 80.9 /100 | #143 | Excellent 2.9% |