Crow vs Samoan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,551,880 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.417. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.059% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to an increase of 58.9 Samoans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $101,580, a difference of 36.8%), wage/income gap (19.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 36.2%), and median household income ($63,681 compared to $86,498, a difference of 35.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $37,498, a difference of 6.3%), median earnings ($38,707 compared to $44,206, a difference of 14.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $54,610, a difference of 16.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (30.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 119.4%), single male poverty (23.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 99.6%), and married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 95.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 11.2%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 35.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 43.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 219.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 216.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 212.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.61%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 81.8%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 34.0%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 23.7%), and married-couple households (41.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 67.9%, a difference of 4.1%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 7.8%), and average family size (3.82 compared to 3.42, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 44.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 18.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 37.9%), bachelor's degree (27.7% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 14.7%), and associate's degree (37.6% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.4% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 0.11%), 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.68%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 25.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 21.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 0.19%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.8%).