Immigrants from Asia vs Samoan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,307,921 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.196. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Samoans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to an increase of 3.4 Samoans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,741 compared to $39,826, a difference of 24.9%), median male earnings ($63,240 compared to $51,389, a difference of 23.1%), and median earnings ($53,310 compared to $44,206, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $54,610, a difference of 3.2%), householder income over 65 years ($67,594 compared to $65,427, a difference of 3.3%), and wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 21.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 16.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.84%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and single male poverty (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 17.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 39.1%, a difference of 14.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.92%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 25.8%), births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 21.8%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (49.1% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.82%), family households with children (28.8% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (66.1% compared to 67.9%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 42.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 36.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 61.5%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 23.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 70.7%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 65.5%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 60.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.4% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.060%), 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Samoan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 27.4%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 20.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 5.3%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 6.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.9%).