Choctaw vs Immigrants from the Azores Community Comparison

COMPARE

Choctaw
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrants from the Azores
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Choctaw

Immigrants from the Azores

Fair
Poor
2,496
SOCIAL INDEX
22.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
254th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,552
SOCIAL INDEX
13.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
302nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from the Azores Integration in Choctaw Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,377,821 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.481. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.247% in Immigrants from the Azores. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 247.2 Immigrants from the Azores.
Choctaw Integration in Immigrants from the Azores Communities

Choctaw vs Immigrants from the Azores Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,168 compared to $92,322, a difference of 18.1%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $52,621, a difference of 15.8%), and median household income ($69,947 compared to $80,357, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $52,121, a difference of 1.8%), wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and per capita income ($35,999 compared to $39,608, a difference of 10.0%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from the Azores Income
Income MetricChoctawImmigrants from the Azores
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,999
Tragic
$39,608
Median Family Income
Tragic
$84,835
Tragic
$95,402
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,947
Tragic
$80,357
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,270
Fair
$45,812
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,729
Fair
$53,503
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,775
Tragic
$38,573
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,450
Good
$52,621
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$78,168
Fair
$92,322
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$82,287
Tragic
$94,138
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,060
Tragic
$52,121
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Tragic
27.2%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from the Azores Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 45.4%), single father poverty (20.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 29.9%), and single male poverty (17.0% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (21.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 12.6%), single mother poverty (36.4% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 13.1%), and family poverty (11.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 13.2%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from the Azores Poverty
Poverty MetricChoctawImmigrants from the Azores
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
13.1%
Families
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
10.3%
Males
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Tragic
16.8%
Tragic
14.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.3%
Exceptional
16.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.1%
Tragic
15.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Tragic
18.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.3%
Tragic
18.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Fair
16.8%
Single Males
Tragic
17.0%
Tragic
13.2%
Single Females
Tragic
27.2%
Tragic
23.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
20.7%
Excellent
15.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
36.4%
Tragic
32.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.3%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.4%
Tragic
12.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Tragic
15.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
16.4%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from the Azores Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 29.8%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 23.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.4%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from the Azores Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChoctawImmigrants from the Azores
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
6.1%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
6.4%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Fair
8.8%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.9%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.0%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from the Azores Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 9.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.5% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.6%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from the Azores Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChoctawImmigrants from the Azores
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.5%
Tragic
63.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.4%
Tragic
77.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Exceptional
41.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Exceptional
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.0%
Tragic
83.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.4%
Tragic
81.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.5%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.2%
Tragic
80.1%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from the Azores Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 14.9%), births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.16%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and family households (64.9% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from the Azores Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChoctawImmigrants from the Azores
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Exceptional
65.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.0%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.5%
Currently Married
Fair
46.3%
Tragic
45.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.9%
Tragic
39.6%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from the Azores Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 22.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 5.1%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from the Azores Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChoctawImmigrants from the Azores
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.2%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.3%
Excellent
56.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.0%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
7.5%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from the Azores Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 67.7%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from the Azores Education Level
Education Level MetricChoctawImmigrants from the Azores
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
96.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
95.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Tragic
94.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
93.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.2%
Tragic
92.5%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.1%
Tragic
90.8%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Tragic
89.0%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Tragic
87.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.8%
Tragic
85.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Tragic
82.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Tragic
78.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.3%
Tragic
54.7%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.3%
Tragic
48.4%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.8%
Tragic
35.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Tragic
27.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Tragic
10.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.4%

Choctaw vs Immigrants from the Azores Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 36.6%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 22.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.0%).
Choctaw vs Immigrants from the Azores Disability
Disability MetricChoctawImmigrants from the Azores
Disability
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
14.2%
Males
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
13.4%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.9%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
9.0%
Tragic
8.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
14.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.2%
Tragic
26.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.7%
Tragic
50.9%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
4.5%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.3%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
3.0%