French American Indian vs Immigrants from the Azores Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,372,347 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.304. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.040% in Immigrants from the Azores. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to an increase of 39.6 Immigrants from the Azores.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,899 compared to $92,322, a difference of 7.5%), householder income under 25 years ($48,977 compared to $52,621, a difference of 7.4%), and wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($40,244 compared to $39,608, a difference of 1.6%), median family income ($92,872 compared to $95,402, a difference of 2.7%), and median female earnings ($36,920 compared to $38,573, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 33.5%), receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 21.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.35%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 0.72%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 30.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 29.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 77.8%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.0%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 9.6%), and births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.0% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 0.13%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.43%), and married-couple households (44.1% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 10.6%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.75%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 43.9%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 32.9%), and master's degree (12.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 68.6%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 10.1%), and female disability (13.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.090%), male disability (13.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.56%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.8% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 0.70%).