Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from the Azores Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Hong Kong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrants from the Azores
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Hong Kong

Immigrants from the Azores

Good
Poor
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,552
SOCIAL INDEX
13.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
302nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from the Azores Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,346,385 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.043. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Immigrants from the Azores. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to an increase of 5.1 Immigrants from the Azores.
Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Immigrants from the Azores Communities

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from the Azores Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($56,709 compared to $39,608, a difference of 43.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $92,322, a difference of 38.8%), and median household income ($111,519 compared to $80,357, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 6.4%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $52,621, a difference of 18.0%), and median female earnings ($49,818 compared to $38,573, a difference of 29.1%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from the Azores Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from the Azores
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$56,709
Tragic
$39,608
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$131,067
Tragic
$95,402
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$111,519
Tragic
$80,357
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$59,433
Fair
$45,812
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$70,146
Fair
$53,503
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$49,818
Tragic
$38,573
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$62,083
Good
$52,621
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$128,140
Fair
$92,322
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$127,500
Tragic
$94,138
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,567
Tragic
$52,121
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.5%
Tragic
27.2%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from the Azores Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 80.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 54.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.4% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 4.6%), single father poverty (14.2% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 11.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.6%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from the Azores Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from the Azores
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.1%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Tragic
10.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.2%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.5%
Exceptional
16.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
15.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
18.9%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
18.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Fair
16.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
13.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
23.5%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.2%
Excellent
15.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.4%
Tragic
32.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Tragic
12.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Tragic
15.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
16.4%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from the Azores Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 59.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 39.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 36.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.6%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from the Azores Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from the Azores
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.1%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.4%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.4%
Tragic
19.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
6.2%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Tragic
6.3%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.0%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from the Azores Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 36.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 7.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.3%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from the Azores Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from the Azores
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
63.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.4%
Tragic
77.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.5%
Exceptional
41.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.6%
Exceptional
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
83.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Tragic
81.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
80.1%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from the Azores Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 67.8%), single mother households (4.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 55.8%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.77%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from the Azores Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from the Azores
Family Households
Exceptional
66.1%
Exceptional
65.6%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.6%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.5%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
45.1%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
23.6%
Tragic
39.6%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from the Azores Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 16.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 16.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 12.0%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from the Azores Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from the Azores
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.3%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.6%
Excellent
56.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.2%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
7.5%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from the Azores Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 126.7%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 105.0%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 100.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.36%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.37%), and nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.38%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from the Azores Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from the Azores
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Tragic
3.0%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Tragic
97.0%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
97.0%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
96.1%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Tragic
95.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Tragic
94.7%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Tragic
93.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Tragic
92.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Tragic
90.8%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Tragic
89.0%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Tragic
87.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Tragic
85.3%
High School Diploma
Average
89.3%
Tragic
82.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
78.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.0%
Tragic
54.7%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Tragic
48.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.4%
Tragic
35.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.2%
Tragic
27.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.5%
Tragic
10.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
1.4%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from the Azores Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from the Azores communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 136.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 74.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 63.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 50.9%, a difference of 9.6%), cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 11.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 25.0%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from the Azores Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from the Azores
Disability
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
14.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
13.4%
Females
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.95%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
8.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
14.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
19.9%
Tragic
26.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
50.9%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
3.0%