U.S. Virgin Islander vs Immigrants from Australia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,562,297 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia within U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.212. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in U.S. Virgin Islanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.098% in Immigrants from Australia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 U.S. Virgin Islanders corresponds to an increase of 98.4 Immigrants from Australia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,589 compared to $57,953, a difference of 54.2%), median family income ($85,294 compared to $126,620, a difference of 48.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,911 compared to $115,947, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,448 compared to $56,660, a difference of 19.4%), median female earnings ($36,424 compared to $46,573, a difference of 27.9%), and wage/income gap (21.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 30.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 80.6%), family poverty (12.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 63.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (22.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 61.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 7.3%), single father poverty (18.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 15.2%), and single male poverty (14.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 30.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 30.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.6% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.94%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.8% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 69.1%), births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 48.7%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 2.1%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.13, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 25.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 17.4%), and no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.6% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.5% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 89.5%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 88.4%), and master's degree (13.1% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 59.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.66%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 32.8%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 25.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 4.5%), disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 8.4%).