Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from Australia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,235,570 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia within Immigrant from Thailand communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.374. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Thailand within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.100% in Immigrants from Australia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Thailand corresponds to an increase of 99.8 Immigrants from Australia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,289 compared to $57,953, a difference of 37.0%), median male earnings ($52,908 compared to $67,634, a difference of 27.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,337 compared to $115,947, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,645 compared to $56,660, a difference of 11.9%), householder income over 65 years ($60,217 compared to $69,164, a difference of 14.9%), and wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 35.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 28.2%), and family poverty (9.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 0.11%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.60%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.70%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 10.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.84%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 34.7%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 26.9%), and births to unmarried women (32.8% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.2% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.0%), family households (63.8% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and currently married (45.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 45.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 61.2%), no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 54.4%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 24.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 16.0%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 4.3%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 5.6%).