Immigrants from Congo vs Immigrants from Australia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,261,462 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.042. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Immigrants from Australia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 6.7 Immigrants from Australia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,720 compared to $57,953, a difference of 62.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $115,947, a difference of 60.6%), and median family income ($82,216 compared to $126,620, a difference of 54.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 30.1%), householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $56,660, a difference of 31.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,393 compared to $69,164, a difference of 34.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (22.5% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 65.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 63.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (22.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 62.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.9%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 25.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 24.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 18.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.93%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 59.4%), births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 38.2%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.3%), family households (59.2% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (27.3% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 37.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 0.61%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 89.5%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 75.8%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 65.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.72%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.73%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 37.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 23.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.4%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 7.1%).