Navajo vs Immigrants from Australia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,685,532 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.627. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Australia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to an increase of 6.4 Immigrants from Australia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($29,031 compared to $57,953, a difference of 99.6%), median family income ($70,989 compared to $126,620, a difference of 78.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($66,529 compared to $115,947, a difference of 74.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 26.2%), householder income under 25 years ($42,380 compared to $56,660, a difference of 33.7%), and median female earnings ($33,046 compared to $46,573, a difference of 40.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 170.5%), family poverty (18.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 148.5%), and receiving food stamps (21.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 130.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (30.3% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 44.7%), single mother poverty (40.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 47.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 58.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 110.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (10.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 102.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 99.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 12.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 31.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (56.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 16.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (73.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 16.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.2% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 13.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 93.4%), single mother households (8.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 73.7%), and single father households (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 61.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 3.5%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 6.5%), and family households (66.4% compared to 61.3%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 46.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 41.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 23.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 140.3%), master's degree (9.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 121.3%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 107.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.33%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 61.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 60.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (33.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 58.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.5%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.3%).