Ute vs Bangladeshi Community Comparison

COMPARE

Ute
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Bangladeshi
Race
Ancestry
AfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)InupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Ute

Bangladeshis

Fair
Fair
2,439
SOCIAL INDEX
21.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
258th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,611
SOCIAL INDEX
23.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
249th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Bangladeshi Integration in Ute Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,086,918 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Bangladeshis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 8.7 Bangladeshis.
Ute Integration in Bangladeshi Communities

Ute vs Bangladeshi Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 25.3%), householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $47,589, a difference of 5.1%), and median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $46,744, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($41,051 compared to $41,263, a difference of 0.52%), median family income ($87,596 compared to $88,358, a difference of 0.87%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,166 compared to $81,363, a difference of 0.99%).
Ute vs Bangladeshi Income
Income MetricUteBangladeshi
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,651
Tragic
$35,897
Median Family Income
Tragic
$87,596
Tragic
$88,358
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,402
Tragic
$74,112
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,051
Tragic
$41,263
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,899
Tragic
$46,744
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,960
Tragic
$35,960
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,997
Tragic
$47,589
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Tragic
$81,363
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$83,937
Tragic
$86,402
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,949
Tragic
$54,719
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.8%
Exceptional
22.2%

Ute vs Bangladeshi Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 21.8%), male poverty (16.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 19.2%), and single female poverty (28.4% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 2.4%), married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.6% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 7.7%).
Ute vs Bangladeshi Poverty
Poverty MetricUteBangladeshi
Poverty
Tragic
16.9%
Tragic
14.8%
Families
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
10.9%
Males
Tragic
16.2%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
16.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
22.5%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
15.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.5%
Tragic
20.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
20.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
20.0%
Single Males
Tragic
15.7%
Tragic
13.3%
Single Females
Tragic
28.4%
Tragic
24.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
15.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.7%
Tragic
31.7%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.2%
Fair
11.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
15.0%

Ute vs Bangladeshi Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 41.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 37.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.7%).
Ute vs Bangladeshi Unemployment
Unemployment MetricUteBangladeshi
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
16.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Average
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Good
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.5%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Fair
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.8%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
7.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.3%

Ute vs Bangladeshi Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 42.5%, a difference of 14.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.4% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 5.9%).
Ute vs Bangladeshi Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricUteBangladeshi
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
60.9%
Exceptional
65.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.7%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Exceptional
42.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.8%
Exceptional
78.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.8%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
78.9%
Tragic
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.4%
Poor
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
76.6%
Tragic
81.3%

Ute vs Bangladeshi Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.6%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.14%), currently married (43.9% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 0.45%), and married-couple households (44.4% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 2.1%).
Ute vs Bangladeshi Family Structure
Family Structure MetricUteBangladeshi
Family Households
Average
64.3%
Average
64.3%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
30.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.4%
Tragic
43.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.49
Exceptional
3.37
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
3.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
8.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.9%
Tragic
43.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Poor
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.0%
Tragic
34.4%

Ute vs Bangladeshi Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 33.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 15.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 3.6%).
Ute vs Bangladeshi Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricUteBangladeshi
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
8.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Exceptional
58.4%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Exceptional
7.6%

Ute vs Bangladeshi Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 66.4%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 56.7%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (91.1% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.23%), 12th grade, no diploma (89.0% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and high school diploma (86.2% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.84%).
Ute vs Bangladeshi Education Level
Education Level MetricUteBangladeshi
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
3.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.3%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
96.1%
5th Grade
Good
97.4%
Tragic
95.9%
6th Grade
Good
97.1%
Tragic
95.7%
7th Grade
Average
96.1%
Tragic
94.5%
8th Grade
Average
95.8%
Tragic
94.3%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Tragic
93.4%
10th Grade
Fair
93.4%
Tragic
92.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Tragic
90.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Tragic
89.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.2%
Tragic
86.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.8%
Tragic
83.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.2%
Tragic
61.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.8%
Tragic
54.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.6%
Tragic
40.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
10.5%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
1.2%

Ute vs Bangladeshi Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 49.6%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.6%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (13.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.1%).
Ute vs Bangladeshi Disability
Disability MetricUteBangladeshi
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Tragic
12.6%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.86%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
13.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
26.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.6%
Tragic
49.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.5%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
18.6%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Tragic
2.8%