Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Bangladeshi Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 136,911,859 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis within Immigrant from Eastern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.086. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Europe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Bangladeshis. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Europe corresponds to a decrease of 6.4 Bangladeshis.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,316 compared to $35,897, a difference of 37.4%), median male earnings ($60,958 compared to $46,744, a difference of 30.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,662 compared to $81,363, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,693 compared to $54,719, a difference of 14.6%), householder income under 25 years ($55,572 compared to $47,589, a difference of 16.8%), and wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 38.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.4% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 37.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.6% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.9%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 15.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 8.9%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 42.5%, a difference of 18.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.90%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 54.2%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 45.5%), and births to unmarried women (27.6% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 0.45%), average family size (3.17 compared to 3.37, a difference of 6.2%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 56.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 39.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 5.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 58.4%, a difference of 13.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 25.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 74.4%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 74.2%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 69.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.5%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Bangladeshi communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 35.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 23.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.5%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 49.4%, a difference of 6.6%).