Celtic vs Immigrants from North Macedonia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,047,009 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North Macedonia within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.671. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.455% in Immigrants from North Macedonia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to an increase of 455.2 Immigrants from North Macedonia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($50,447 compared to $56,503, a difference of 12.0%), median male earnings ($54,242 compared to $59,189, a difference of 9.1%), and median earnings ($45,732 compared to $49,658, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($60,608 compared to $61,175, a difference of 0.94%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and per capita income ($43,621 compared to $45,622, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 23.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 23.0%), and single female poverty (22.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 21.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 11.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.70%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 76.1%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 18.3%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 0.46%), married-couple households (47.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and currently married (47.8% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 31.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 23.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 17.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.2%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 16.2%), and bachelor's degree (37.0% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.010%), high school diploma (90.6% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and college, 1 year or more (59.4% compared to 59.5%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from North Macedonia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 33.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 26.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.9%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.0%).