Celtic vs Jordanian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Jordanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Celtics

Jordanians

Average
Exceptional
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,589
SOCIAL INDEX
93.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
11th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Jordanian Integration in Celtic Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,256,700 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.268. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.086% in Jordanians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to a decrease of 85.7 Jordanians.
Celtic Integration in Jordanian Communities

Celtic vs Jordanian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,896 compared to $109,376, a difference of 10.6%), median household income ($83,193 compared to $91,794, a difference of 10.3%), and median family income ($101,139 compared to $109,865, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.7%), householder income under 25 years ($50,447 compared to $51,796, a difference of 2.7%), and per capita income ($43,621 compared to $45,605, a difference of 4.5%).
Celtic vs Jordanian Income
Income MetricCelticJordanian
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,621
Excellent
$45,605
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,139
Exceptional
$109,865
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,193
Exceptional
$91,794
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,732
Exceptional
$49,632
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,242
Exceptional
$58,500
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,283
Exceptional
$41,464
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,447
Fair
$51,796
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,241
Exceptional
$99,186
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$98,896
Exceptional
$109,376
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,608
Exceptional
$64,313
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
26.8%

Celtic vs Jordanian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (22.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 20.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 20.3%), and single male poverty (14.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.97%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.5%).
Celtic vs Jordanian Poverty
Poverty MetricCelticJordanian
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Exceptional
11.4%
Families
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Average
11.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Average
13.4%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
18.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
15.6%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.4%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Exceptional
15.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
17.0%
Exceptional
14.8%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Females
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
18.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.9%
Exceptional
26.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
10.2%

Celtic vs Jordanian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 12.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.91%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.4%).
Celtic vs Jordanian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCelticJordanian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.5%
Average
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Good
5.3%

Celtic vs Jordanian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 13.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 66.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Celtic vs Jordanian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCelticJordanian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.8%
Exceptional
66.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Exceptional
80.1%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.3%
Fair
36.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Excellent
75.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Tragic
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Average
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
83.4%

Celtic vs Jordanian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 16.7%), divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 12.9%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.8% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 0.39%), married-couple households (47.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (63.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.8%).
Celtic vs Jordanian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCelticJordanian
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Exceptional
65.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Exceptional
29.0%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.3%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Good
3.24
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Excellent
6.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.8%
Exceptional
48.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
11.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Exceptional
28.5%

Celtic vs Jordanian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.73%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 5.6%).
Celtic vs Jordanian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCelticJordanian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
8.5%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.1%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.2%
Exceptional
57.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Excellent
6.6%

Celtic vs Jordanian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.8%), master's degree (14.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 11.9%), and bachelor's degree (37.0% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.3% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.18%), 11th grade (93.7% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.40%).
Celtic vs Jordanian Education Level
Education Level MetricCelticJordanian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Excellent
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Good
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Excellent
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Excellent
96.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Exceptional
95.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.7%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
92.2%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.6%
Exceptional
90.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.7%
Exceptional
87.2%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Exceptional
68.0%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Exceptional
49.2%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Exceptional
41.2%
Master's Degree
Average
14.8%
Exceptional
16.5%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Excellent
4.7%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Exceptional
2.0%

Celtic vs Jordanian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Jordanian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 49.0%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 30.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 9.3%).
Celtic vs Jordanian Disability
Disability MetricCelticJordanian
Disability
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.2%
Exceptional
22.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.2%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Exceptional
16.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%