Celtic vs Immigrants from Cambodia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Cambodia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Celtics

Immigrants from Cambodia

Average
Fair
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,971
SOCIAL INDEX
27.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
236th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Cambodia Integration in Celtic Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,600,326 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cambodia within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.611. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.517% in Immigrants from Cambodia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to an increase of 517.1 Immigrants from Cambodia.
Celtic Integration in Immigrants from Cambodia Communities

Celtic vs Immigrants from Cambodia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 17.1%), per capita income ($43,621 compared to $40,434, a difference of 7.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,608 compared to $57,580, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($83,193 compared to $83,304, a difference of 0.13%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,241 compared to $91,533, a difference of 0.77%), and median earnings ($45,732 compared to $45,090, a difference of 1.4%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Cambodia Income
Income MetricCelticImmigrants from Cambodia
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,621
Tragic
$40,434
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,139
Tragic
$97,222
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,193
Fair
$83,304
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,732
Poor
$45,090
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,242
Tragic
$51,594
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,283
Poor
$38,833
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,447
Good
$52,450
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,241
Poor
$91,533
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$98,896
Poor
$96,537
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,608
Tragic
$57,580
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Exceptional
23.3%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Cambodia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.9% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 27.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 25.9%), and single father poverty (18.5% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (17.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.86%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.5% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.7%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Cambodia Poverty
Poverty MetricCelticImmigrants from Cambodia
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Tragic
13.4%
Families
Good
8.8%
Tragic
9.9%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
12.2%
Females
Average
13.4%
Tragic
14.5%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
18.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.5%
Fair
13.9%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
17.9%
Poor
18.1%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.4%
Tragic
17.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Tragic
17.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
17.0%
Tragic
18.1%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Good
12.7%
Single Females
Tragic
22.7%
Fair
21.2%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.9%
Good
28.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
12.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
13.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
13.9%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Cambodia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.52%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.0%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Cambodia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCelticImmigrants from Cambodia
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.5%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Average
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
6.9%
Average
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Average
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Excellent
7.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Fair
5.5%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Cambodia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.35%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Cambodia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCelticImmigrants from Cambodia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.8%
Exceptional
66.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Poor
79.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.3%
Average
36.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Good
75.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Good
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Tragic
81.9%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Cambodia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 17.8%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.8%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 2.6%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and married-couple households (47.3% compared to 44.9%, a difference of 5.4%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Cambodia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCelticImmigrants from Cambodia
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Exceptional
65.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Exceptional
28.9%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.3%
Tragic
44.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Exceptional
3.33
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Tragic
7.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.8%
Tragic
44.5%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.0%
Excellent
11.8%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Tragic
34.8%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Cambodia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 26.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.2%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Cambodia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCelticImmigrants from Cambodia
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Good
10.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.1%
Good
89.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.2%
Excellent
56.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Exceptional
21.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
7.4%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Cambodia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 114.1%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 23.3%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.0%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Cambodia Education Level
Education Level MetricCelticImmigrants from Cambodia
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
3.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.5%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
95.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
95.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
95.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Tragic
93.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
93.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Tragic
92.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
90.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.7%
Tragic
89.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Tragic
88.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.6%
Tragic
85.6%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.7%
Tragic
82.2%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Tragic
61.5%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
55.4%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Tragic
42.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Tragic
34.2%
Master's Degree
Average
14.8%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.5%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Cambodia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 42.2%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 26.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.9%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 4.4%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Cambodia Disability
Disability MetricCelticImmigrants from Cambodia
Disability
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
12.0%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Poor
11.5%
Females
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.6%
Average
6.6%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
12.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.2%
Tragic
25.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.2%
Tragic
50.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Good
3.0%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.7%