Immigrants from France vs Mexican American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 208,980,523 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians within Immigrant from France communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.306. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from France within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Mexican American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from France corresponds to an increase of 44.3 Mexican American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,557 compared to $37,407, a difference of 45.9%), median male earnings ($63,715 compared to $47,990, a difference of 32.8%), and median family income ($120,076 compared to $90,918, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,805 compared to $51,783, a difference of 3.9%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,826 compared to $56,089, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 36.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 36.5%), and family poverty (8.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 3.6%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 23.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 19.1%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 38.9%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 32.1%), and births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.1%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and currently married (46.2% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 49.1%), no vehicles in household (12.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 42.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 12.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 31.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 108.2%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 107.1%), and master's degree (20.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 80.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from France and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 21.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 19.3%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 3.0%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 3.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 6.1%).