Immigrants from Romania vs Mexican American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,065,650 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians within Immigrant from Romania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.069. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Romania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Mexican American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Romania corresponds to a decrease of 14.9 Mexican American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,463 compared to $37,407, a difference of 32.2%), median male earnings ($61,040 compared to $47,990, a difference of 27.2%), and median family income ($113,434 compared to $90,918, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,522 compared to $51,783, a difference of 7.2%), wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 9.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,462 compared to $56,089, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 38.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 37.2%), and receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.10%), single male poverty (11.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 11.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 19.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 18.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 0.84%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 36.5%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 33.6%), and births to unmarried women (27.9% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 3.8%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and married-couple households (48.3% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 39.4%), no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 25.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 23.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 66.5%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 64.6%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 57.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Romania and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 21.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 20.5%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and female disability (11.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.3%).