U.S. Virgin Islander vs Mexican American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,839,221 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians within U.S. Virgin Islander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.082. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in U.S. Virgin Islanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.046% in Mexican American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 U.S. Virgin Islanders corresponds to an increase of 46.1 Mexican American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 14.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,736 compared to $90,811, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,448 compared to $51,783, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($37,589 compared to $37,407, a difference of 0.49%), median earnings ($41,448 compared to $41,719, a difference of 0.65%), and median male earnings ($47,066 compared to $47,990, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 20.2%), single father poverty (18.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 16.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 2.1%), single female poverty (24.2% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 13.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.6% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.0% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 0.21%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 18.8%), single mother households (8.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 16.9%), and married-couple households (39.8% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.43, a difference of 4.1%), family households (62.6% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and currently married (40.7% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 81.1%), no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 69.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.6% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 7.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.5% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 23.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 51.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 37.4%), master's degree (13.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 16.3%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.85%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.87%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between U.S. Virgin Islander and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.0%), ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.8%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.21%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.9% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.3%).