Carpatho Rusyn vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,276,156 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.263. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Carpatho Rusyns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.040% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Carpatho Rusyns corresponds to an increase of 40.2 Immigrants from Northern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($49,113 compared to $53,185, a difference of 8.3%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and median household income ($86,635 compared to $90,026, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,449 compared to $99,232, a difference of 0.22%), median family income ($107,502 compared to $108,161, a difference of 0.61%), and median male earnings ($57,572 compared to $58,008, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 32.3%), single father poverty (18.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 17.0%), and family poverty (7.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.14%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 18.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 15.2%), and female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.57%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 13.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (25.2% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 10.5%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and average family size (3.06 compared to 3.22, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (45.7% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.53%), currently married (47.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 18.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 59.6%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.8%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of bachelor's degree (42.1% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 0.35%), college, 1 year or more (62.2% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 23.7%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 22.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.5%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.7%).