Swedish vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 315,572,706 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Swedish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.470. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swedes within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swedes corresponds to a decrease of 6.7 Immigrants from Northern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.4% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 16.6%), median female earnings ($39,421 compared to $42,084, a difference of 6.8%), and median earnings ($47,851 compared to $49,648, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,136 compared to $99,232, a difference of 0.10%), median family income ($108,499 compared to $108,161, a difference of 0.31%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,736 compared to $62,522, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 35.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 25.8%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.69%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 22.3%), female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.1% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 22.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.8% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.5%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.2%), and married-couple households (49.7% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 0.44%), family households (64.5% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 85.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 34.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 6.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.8% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 18.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 29.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 55.8%), master's degree (15.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 12.0%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (62.1% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 0.37%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.86%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 35.7%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 0.010%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 2.3%).