European vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 319,521,567 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within European communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.549. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Europeans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Europeans corresponds to a decrease of 10.0 Immigrants from Northern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between European and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.4% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 16.4%), median female earnings ($39,457 compared to $42,084, a difference of 6.7%), and median earnings ($47,915 compared to $49,648, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($108,099 compared to $108,161, a difference of 0.060%), median male earnings ($57,637 compared to $58,008, a difference of 0.64%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,367 compared to $105,430, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between European and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 19.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (15.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 3.0%), single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between European and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 18.3%), unemployment (4.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.6%), and female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.65%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between European and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.1% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 14.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.76%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.84%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between European and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.2%), married-couple households (49.6% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.33%), family households (65.0% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and births to unmarried women (30.2% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between European and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 77.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 34.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 6.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 28.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between European and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 48.2%), master's degree (15.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 8.0%), and bachelor's degree (39.5% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (61.8% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.78%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between European and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 30.7%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 27.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.040%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.9%).