Danish vs Immigrants from Northern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 297,394,307 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Africa within Danish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.499. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Danes within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.114% in Immigrants from Northern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Danes corresponds to an increase of 113.9 Immigrants from Northern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Danish and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (31.0% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 22.7%), median female earnings ($37,730 compared to $42,084, a difference of 11.5%), and median earnings ($46,392 compared to $49,648, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,619 compared to $105,430, a difference of 0.18%), householder income under 25 years ($53,041 compared to $53,185, a difference of 0.27%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,117 compared to $62,522, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Danish and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 25.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 24.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.67%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Danish and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.4%), unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Danish and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.7% compared to 35.9%, a difference of 24.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Danish and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.8%), married-couple households (51.1% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 11.1%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.5%), births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (28.7% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Danish and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 91.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 51.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.5% compared to 87.4%, a difference of 7.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (63.3% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 20.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 39.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Danish and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 49.6%), master's degree (14.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 17.4%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (61.7% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 0.26%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.81%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Danish and Immigrants from Northern Africa communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 29.1%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 26.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.8% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.5%).