Uruguayan vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,961,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.367. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.134% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 133.7 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,631 compared to $118,056, a difference of 26.1%), median male earnings ($53,680 compared to $66,903, a difference of 24.6%), and median family income ($100,656 compared to $125,150, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 7.6%), householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $57,123, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,090 compared to $69,872, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 26.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 26.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 4.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 20.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.28%), male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.46%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.57%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 32.2%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 28.9%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.060%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.33%), and family households (64.5% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 20.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 67.5%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 41.8%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.020%), 5th grade (97.0% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and 6th grade (96.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 22.2%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 19.3%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.19%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.8%).