Choctaw vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 255,022,940 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.288. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Immigrants from Eastern Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to a decrease of 7.1 Immigrants from Eastern Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,168 compared to $118,056, a difference of 51.0%), median household income ($69,947 compared to $104,796, a difference of 49.8%), and per capita income ($35,999 compared to $53,806, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 27.1%, a difference of 4.0%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $57,123, a difference of 25.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $69,872, a difference of 31.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 73.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 61.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 60.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 55.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 28.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 18.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 71.8%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 47.3%), single father households (2.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 43.7%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.060%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.25%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 71.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 53.2%, a difference of 11.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 22.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 104.9%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 103.4%), and master's degree (11.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 88.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.020%), 9th grade (95.1% compared to 94.6%, a difference of 0.54%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Eastern Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 86.8%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 83.4%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 80.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 9.7%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 14.1%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 31.2%).